𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞?
I am working on process improvements for a company left impaired because they didn't anticipate the change.
Change is hard for anyone and it is especially hard for businesses to adapt; adapting to various changes is a necessary commitment to succeed.Employees need continuous improvement and development – if they are unhappy with the company and refuse to be a team player then chances are they will leave. Why wait to address the retention or replacement?
If your tax preparer has an exit plan and you know they are retiring soon – the company will need a new tax professional. Why wait until the last minute to start vetting a new company?
If the person handling the company books has done so for decades, chances are they will be leaving the company by choice or necessity. Why wait until the last minute to either find someone new or start learning about their job duties?
In the instance of fraud, if you refused to confront the fraudster for the sake of dismissing the intuitive feeling – why wait until the company has been defrauded to deal with the problem?
𝐈𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡, 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲, 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐮𝐝, 𝐬𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞.
𝑰𝒇 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒌 𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒆𝒆 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒄𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒃𝒆 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒐𝒓 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒃𝒆 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒅, 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒔 𝒘𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒆?
Comments
Post a Comment